Analysis of Main Effect of Independent Six-individual Characteristic Factors and Workplace Temperature on Safe Weight of Lift Model


  • Omotunde Muyiwa Department of Industrial & Production Engineering, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
  • Mojisola Bolarinwa Department of Industrial & Production Engineering, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
  • Olayinka Olasesan Department of General Studies in Education, Federal College of Education, Abeokuta


Body weight, Ergonomic model, Low back pain, Spine shrinkage, Safe weight of lift


This study analysed main effect of the independent six-individual characteristic gender based factors of age, body weight, spinal shrinkage, spine length, and frequency of lifts, and workplace temperature on safe weight of lift model. These six-individual characteristic factors and workplace temperature selected were based on biomechanical, physiological and psychophysical approaches. These were yet to be seen used together in any other studies. The human ergonomic factors and workplace temperature were compounded to develop a safe weight of lift (SWL) model using principle of strain energy to determine safe weight that can minimise threat of developing low back pain among manual workers. A subjective selection technique was used to select 50 practising male construction workers. The measurements of human ergonomic factors and workplace temperature were obtained using the ZT-160 scale, stadiometer, measuring tape, clock timer and Extech RH/Temperature pen device. The obtained data were inputted into the SPSS to analysis main effect of human ergonomic factors and workplace temperature on SWL model. Data were analysed using Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) and ANOVA at . The main effect analysis of the six-individual characteristic factors gave highest R2 and ? of 0.33 and 0.58 for the spinal shrinkage. The body weight and spinal shrinkage were statistically significant at p<.05. The ANOVA analysis results revealed that only body weight was significant at p<.05 with highest F-test = 3.47. Hence, the analyses of the human ergonomic factors and workplace temperature independently shown that body weight is the most significant factor of the developed model.


. S. Ahmad and M. Muzammil. “Revised NIOSH lifting equation: a critical evaluation”. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, pp. 1-8, 2022.

. O. G. Akanbi and O. A. Muyiwa. “A mathematical model to determine safe weight lift among manual material handling workers in Nigeria”. Global Scientific Journals, vol. 9, pp. 2138 – 2152, 2021.

. O. T. Al-Meanazel, A. S. Al-Shudiefat, H. A. Al-Momani, and F. Aqlan. “Factors affecting spine loading in a box lifting task: a digital human modeling study”. International Journal Industrial and System Engineering, vol. 37, pp. 168-178, 2021.

. N. Arjmand, M. Amini, A. Shirazi-Adi, A. Plamondon, and M. Parnianpour. “Revised NIOSH lifting equation may generate spine loads exceeding recommended limits”. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, vol. 47, pp. 1-8, 2015.

. M. S. Barim, R. F. Sesek, M. F. Capanoglu, P. Drinkaus, M. C. Schall, S. Gallagher, and A. D. Gerard. “Improving the risk assessment capability of the revised NIOSH lifting equation by incorporating personal characteristic”. Journal of Applied Ergonomics, vol. 74, pp. 67-73, 2019.

. A. M. Genaidy, S. M. Waly, T. M. Khalil, and J. Hidalgo. “Spinal compression tolerance limits for the design of manual material operations in the workplace”. Ergonomics Journal, vol. 36, pp. 415 – 434, 1993.

. F. Ghezelbash, A. Shirazi-Adi, N. Arjmand, Z. El-Ouaaid, and A. Plamondon. “Effects of sex, age, body height, and body-weighton spinal loads: sensitivity analysis in a subject-specific trunk musculoskeletal model”. Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 49, pp. 3492-3501, 2016.

. N. Girish, R. Iqbal, and V. Khanzode. “Influence of age on lifting capacity among manual materials handlers”. IOS Press, vol. 60, pp. 163-168, 2018.

. M. Hajihosseinal, N. Arjmand, and A. Shirazi-Adl. “Effect of body-weighton spinal loads in various activities: a personalized biomechanical modelling approach”. Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 40, pp. 276 – 262, 2015.

. I. Y-J. Hung, T. T-F. Shih, B-B. Chen, S-H. Lious, I-K. Ho, and Y. L. Guo. “The roles of lumbar load thresholds in cumulative lifting exposure to predict disk protrusion in an Asian population”. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, vol. 21, pp. 1-13, 2020.

. S. O. Ismaila. “Post work height shrinkage based model for predicting safe weight of lift”. PhD. Thesis. University of Ibadan, Nigeria, 2006

. S. O. Ismaila, and O. E. Charles - Owaba. “A quatitative approach for establishing safe weight of lift”. Engineering Review vol. 32, pp. 1-8, 2012.

. E. Jorgen. “Industrial seating and spinal loading”. PhD. Thesis. University of Nottingham, United Kingdom, 1986.

. T. Kjellstrom, I. Holmer, and B. Lemke. “Workplace heat stress, health and productivity - an increasing challenge for low and middle - income countries during climate change”. Journal of Global Health Action vol. 4, pp. 22-25, 2009.

. M. Marshek. Design of machine and structural parts. 1987. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc.

. P. S. Sheppard, J. M. Stevenson, and R. B. Graham. “Sex - based differences in lifting technique under increasing load conditions: a principal component analysis”. Journal of Applied Ergonomics, pp. 186-195, 2016.

. A. Plamondon, C. Lariviere, D. Denis, H. Mecheri, and I. Nastasia. “Difference between male and female workers lifting the same relative load when palletizing boxes”. Journal of Applied Ergonomics, vol. 60, pp.93-102, 2019.




How to Cite

Omotunde Muyiwa, Mojisola Bolarinwa, & Olayinka Olasesan. (2023). Analysis of Main Effect of Independent Six-individual Characteristic Factors and Workplace Temperature on Safe Weight of Lift Model. International Journal of Applied Sciences: Current and Future Research Trends, 18(1), 134–145. Retrieved from